Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Orangezoo, post: 4743078, member: 237"] So because of the longer GOR and not having a geographical advantage the ACC was reactive? A few questions: 1- How do you know if those schools had any real interest/desire with joining the ACC? Could it not have been where it was always the B12 they preferred? 2- Why would those schools change UNC/FSU/Clemsons mind long term? 3- If the GOR was ending sooner the ACC would be much worse off. If those programs like the "lease" being shorter then it's still only a rental where they seek to move anyways is it not? The ACC was late to the game in missing the opportunity of adding the more regional options the B12 gathered. That's where you can argue there was definitely a miss. But these other Pac 12 schools - I don't see it. [/QUOTE]