Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="atom58, post: 4774316, member: 5312"] They signed to get more $$$ and stability as the others did. This basically saved the ACC over the years. The gravy train from these cable TV conference channels will one day end. The last graph I saw showed the downward trend (over some past years) of not only cable TV but broadcast TV too! On the other hand, streaming has an upward trend. There may be some floor to this graph which is not zero but that floor will not likely support the conferences to the extent they previously had so they will have to look for $$$ elsewhere. I do not support FSU going to the SEC. I doubt they would be admitted as the SEC still remembers 1990 when they thought FSU would join and then it came out in the press that FSU was talking to the ACC so the SEC publicly removed FSU from consideration. Then ACC initially did not have the votes - Duke and UNC to my memory voted against it at first and there was a danger FSU was going nowhere. To this day, whenever FSU plays in any post season game with SEC referees the bias is obvious, years after they fact that we chose the ACC. One other reason is the famous SEC Bagman. They do exist - that SB Nation site had an interview with one. A friend of mine who was close to the boosters told me a leading running back prospect who signed with FSU told Bowden an SEC team had offered him $50 thousand - this was back in the 1980s. He wanted to play at FSU and later went to the NFL. FSU did not pay him to play. Let me add that this is not limited to the SEC. Suspicions are that several prominent teams in the Big10 and Pac12 are involved too - "keeping up with the Joneses". Someone at an ACC sports blog said he personally knew of one prominent Pac12 team when he lived out West providing $$$ and even drugs and prostitutes at player parties. I do not know this for a fact but believe it. Meanwhile the NCAA is apparently too afraid to do anything about it. That would leave only USG and well ... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
ACC, PAC-12, and BIG alliance / conference realignment
Top
Bottom