Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="anomander, post: 5134630, member: 2766"]
I don’t know SDSU and Tulane really don’t move the needle for me. For now we just have to keep hoping the SEC and B10 don’t make a move for FSU/Clemson. I find it strange that all a sudden neither “wants” them. Maybe it’s a negotiating tactic to drive down payout for first few seasons, or the dream would be that it’s legit, and adding FSU and Clemson doesn’t really add enough to the pie to make each schools shares less? Right now i’m more worried about the B10 making a move to try and get down in the southeast, especially Florida. I’m not sure if it still matters, but neither Clemson or FSU currently have an AAU accrediation. However, ironic as it may be, FSU is projected to have it in 2026, and Clemson recently reveled a program called Clemson Elevate, or something like that, in order to receive their accreditation. Could that be a coincidence?

Anyway, let’s assume best case scenario, which i’m unfortunately pessimistic about at the moment, that the ACC somehow manages to stick together. The 4 schools I would want are WVU, Houston, Arizona, and Colorado. However, I don’t see the ACC raiding the B12, or vice versa, as a legit option at this point. Considering that i really can’t think of 4 schools that would be worth bringing in only to reduce our share of the pie. There’s absolutely nobody with enough name value to make it worthwhile.

I wish the ACC was proactive and went after Houston, Utah, Colorado, and Arizona before the B12 added them. In addition to SMU/Calford, it would have been the perfect fit joining east to west.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?