Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5173297, member: 622"]
I have not seen anything substantive to support the claim of a change in the date.  I would wonder why no other school has raised the matter.  Further, even if Swofford had revised the date, there would have to be new consideration to enforce the revised agreement, otherwise it would not likely withstand a challenge.  ESPN is not likely to play a game without at least some new consideration to protect themselves from a lawsuit, which would necessarily involve ESPN as a party.  Thus, FSU's action and active avoidance of involving ESPN would indicate that the claim is less accurate than presented.

It may be that the article writers are misunderstanding the right to revoke as ESPN's renewal date of 2025, which would fit within the agreement you linked.  Though, this limits ESPN's ability to revoke as Section 14 lays out in the redacted portions.

I am also reluctant to believe FSU claims because some of their claims are often facts taken out of context while others are not based in fact.

I agree, it would be nice to have this settled before Christmas, but Alford has to save face.  I am not sure anyone in the ACC wants to give Alford a token, especially if they believe FSU is gone is 2036.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?