Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="WoadBlue, post: 5201546, member: 1145"] It didn't even entice me to flip over for a brief look in. Now if it had about a Pac team vs. an Eastern independent or even a BT team, then I would have done that a few times. What these two leagues and their Globalist corporation financiers miss is that key to most of CFB watching is 2 things: what you see as your 'regional' games (featuring YOUR team) and games between good teams from various regions against each other. What we have is basically 3 plans for the future of Major College Football. 1) the BT/SEC plan, which is to destroy the Major status of all other conferences and take what they feel are the most valuable of their members, and then close ranks permanently. All money and prestige of Major CFB will be theirs. They have the backing of Globalist corporations to do this and thus can pull it off. 2) Project Rudy, which will have ACC and Big 12 as well as SEC and BT. That much larger group will then be closed. All games will be among those 4 leagues and their members. 3) The College Student Football League, which will end conferences as we know them and have 72 teams. Unlike Project Rudy, this one would have some minimal relegation and promotion. Obviously, the worst of those for CFB is the BT/SEC plan. Of the other two, the one I think will never get any hearing from any SEC or BT schools, much less league offices, is College Student Football League. No way that either is going to abandon its league name and history and all the pride that goes with those things. Nor will they go along with any system that could mean one of their members gets demoted while a Bowling Green or UAB or Buffalo or Wyoming could get promoted. If those backing the CSFL could all get behind Project Rudy, there might be a chance that something along those lines could get done. [/QUOTE]

Verification: What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?