Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="WoadBlue, post: 5201841, member: 1145"]
Which means what to you? Do you think that those numbers will; always remain? Is it possible that because that is a first time BT match up that the numbers may be high due to novelty?

What I think it is most is what we allows saw with Miami at Cal. That was Cal's first full sell out since the days of Pete Carroll bringing a Top 5 SC to Berkeley. The TV nub era allowed through the roof for Cal, much better that any of the SEC or BT types would have ever thought possible unless Cal was also undefeated and ranked Top 10. Part of that is the novelty. But the other part is that we had in each a former Pac facing a team of some history and merit from EST. Pac people have always talked about East Coast bias, so much also that they have talked themselves into believing that teams in EST simply matter more if only because the media cares more about them.

AS the ACC tried to help the Pac see before the ACC even had a network, Pac teams [I]need  [/I]to play several teams in EST several times per year. If the 12 member Pac had made a full alliance with the ACC, then it would be fully alive today.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?