Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5365687, member: 622"]
Your logic has been consistent and a concern for me.  The concern has been lessened when the SEC commissioner admitted there is no plan for a super league.  Yes, this is standard, but he indicated that the they need more teams, whether in more conferences (i.e. P4 or more) or two super leagues fielded with 64 or more teams.  Your assessment that a 2-7 Alabama v. 3-6 Texas is spot on, not many outside the diehard Alabama and Texas fans will watch that game, which is why a 4-6 BC v. a 3-7 anyone will not draw many fans, CFB fans with no skin in a particular game will watch a game between the bottom feeders when they have a good game with winning teams available on the next channel/stream.

My guess is that a few SEC teams are realizing how top-heavy the SEC actually is.  In truth many conferences with 9-12 teams is the right way to go for rivalries and outside competition.  A playoff with every conference winner and maybe a couple at-large bids is the best resolution.  However, as you correctly point out, are the B1G and SEC ready to share money or is mo' money the immediate goal?
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?