Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5366206, member: 622"]
Thanks for failing to explain how this benefits SU and what FSU and Clemson are offering in exchange for this favorable revised agreement.

You are correct, I will be disappointed if SU votes for this settlement.  Unless SU has a side agreement to protect SU, which would involve tortious interference, then this deal is against SU's interests.

Because the ACC has disdained football, the GOR my not be extended (assuming no defections), we will not know, though you present as if you have inside information.

Yor third paragraph makes no sense.  If FSU or Clemson failed  to garner a full share, a move was not cost effective, better to wait out the ACC agreement and them join with no losses.  (Hint: The numbers were worked out in this an other threads).  Further, ESPN controls FSU media rights, why would ESPN let FSU go to Fox without getting something in return?

FSU fans can think what they want, but you should remember that FSU is running in the red, couldn't pay the $100MM offer to leave (suggesting FSU would pay out of its new revenue over ten years), still cannot raise sufficient funds for its stadium, etc. Please explain where the FSU money is coming from, FSU does not have it.

Again, SU should not cut of its nose to spite its face.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?