Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="HtownOrange, post: 5689141, member: 622"]
Exactly, you offer facts not in evidence to disprove the facts in evidence, (ESPN's and the ACC's actions-Is SU a part of the ACC?  Is SU material to the value of the ACCN deal?) that SU brings in the entire state of NY for ESPN's carriage computations, which directly benefits the ACC and ACCN.  TTech would do no such thing comparable to SU.

Please recall that ESPN and the ACC have acknowledged the ACCN would not be in place, at least at the level it is at, if SU was not a part of the ACC.

Why do you defend a UNC troll that blatantly hates SU?  He routinely posts on the errors and evils of SU in the ACC.  If you support him, why do you post here on an SU fansite?  He made false arguments to detract from the fact that if TTech made financial sense to the ACC and ESPN they would have been invited.  If you wish to support Woad's opinion, provide facts that support that TTech is a financial powerhouse in the Big 12 that makes sense to bring them to the ACC and ESPN.  The "facts" presented by Woad and you are not backed up with sources nor do they overcome the simple fact that TTech did NOT get invited to the ACC.

If you think SU should withdraw from the ACC because Woad says so, please start a new thread. You may have legitimate arguments, as may Woad.  That issue is separate from whether TTech is worthy of joining the ACC.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?