Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="AcAndAc, post: 5324584, member: 10310"] Could just give the conference and the #1 team the option of playing in the game (or not). This year (and perhaps many years), SMU/ACC would have said "no thanks" and taken the autobid. Miami could have played Clemson to try to benefit Miami's at-large resume. Maybe it works to get Miami in... maybe it would not. Probably a safer risk than gambling on Clemson and SMU both making it... even though it worked in 2024. If Syracuse ran the table in 2025... why would we want to have it play one more tough game to potentially lose? If that applies to Syracuse, why not to Clemson, Miami, FSU, etc. [/QUOTE]