Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="elimunelson, post: 4670012, member: 615"] Your point is what i've been saying. Syracuse in a modified northeast conference where every one of the Big 2 conferences will want to dip their toes in opponent wise. Maybe our revenue stream will ultimately be straight to consumer games and purchased opponents from the big 2. Not sure what that looks like per annum but I could see a scenario where BC/Syracuse charge a set rate for the Washington Generals to come play Michigan or Alabama per year. If they are getting 100mm per year from the networks, certainly paying millions per game inventory out of conference will be satiable. Won't bridge the gap but certainly will help [/QUOTE]