Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Consigliere, post: 2208834, member: 559"] "I'm rethinking our position," Silver said. "So our historical position since we raised the age from 18 to 19 was that we want to go from 19 to 20. And the Union's position is that they want to go from 19 to 18." This has always baffled me. Someone explain how the players association does not see a 19 year old kid coming into the league before he is ready to contribute, but has been drafted on "potential," isn't taking a cheap roster spot from a veteran player who would be paid more based on experience. Seems so counter intuitive that I MUST be missing something. [/QUOTE]