Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="rrlbees, post: 73752, member: 96"]
I'm going to turn it around a bit Dick. I think most people, and most in this thread, are saying exactly what you are saying here. There are very few saying get rid of Marrone now. We have IB, who is the board cybil but not one with an agenda. We also have Stan who is the board contrarian. He disagrees to disagree. I don't see many others say get rid of Marrone. But many are critical of specific games, decisions, etc yet say they agree you don't get rid of Marrone now. Now I could also make the argument that my buddy Go has more of an agenda than the ones he is trying to call out. Re-read your words, which are the same words of many folks including JO who many here respect. Go isn't saying that, he is saying we have a long ways to go and he says that often. But he believes we have a long ways to go because of other people and things not completely in the staffs control, not because of things Marrone and the staff may or may not have done wrong. It's someone elses fault, the staff is infallible. So I think, agenda is the wrong term and I don't think there are as many "loons" as being portrayed (chuck aside). And just to be clear about my feelings as I have said in several other posts, there is no way we should be losing to ALL of our peers, but I do think Marrone will get us there and there is no way we should even be considering right now to get rid of him.

OK Go, have at it. ;)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?