Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="RandomGuy, post: 3413049, member: 6422"]
With tests coming back after 48 hours, I think we can be sure it's not the quick test.  Swab or saliva, I presume.  Swab has some inherent issues on where the tester gets the swab...(false negative) Saliva "may" be more reliable.(Corrections welcome- shipping/how its administered should be less of an issue with supervision and direct lab affiliations)

With the last 2 tests, if you get a positive? You can be pretty sure its positive. (my understanding)... While it doesn't answer false negatives... The # of players returning positive could shape testing going forward.

Seems like testing pre-game/post game might be in order.  (to help eliminate false negatives)

Please dont hate me... Scientifically, it could be a mathematical good thing  with so many returning positive.  It seems about 5% positive, which would triple the # of cases nationwide(lower mortality)   ALL asymptomatic,  which could yield a MUCH higher immunity for the age group.    PLEASE Tell me numerous universities are studying this. It's the ONLY wide scale "study" I know...$$$   I hate assumptions, and there is some very important info here...

(counters welcome,  as the lines I'm drawing "may" pass muster on the surface.(need the real data)  I'm being hopeful. tell me what I'm missing.)
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?