Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RandomGuy, post: 3451815, member: 6422"] The mantra has been... no students, then no student athletes. If not safe for students, not safe for student athletes... SOOOOO... What they are doing is leaving it open ended, saying when it's safe they'll return students. Not safe for students BUT athletes stay, because, ya know someday it might be safe for students. I can see this as a way for the NCAA to back track on their "policy", or put an asterisk that should read "If it's not safe for students(*someday in the future or eventually) , then not safe for student athletes. They've had 8 positive players (about 10%) Because they live in a group college setting. [/QUOTE]