Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="RandomGuy, post: 3477987, member: 6422"] it just bugs the h3ll out of me. Folks read 2 sentences, and draw conclusions from that. Some use it to make it look like less football players are positive. That # can be/is used to fit an agenda/narrative. The actual # of humans is the important part. Not the percentage of how many freaking tests you ran. Its an over reported, useless variable. ***Like enviro just said. Sometimes that's all you can find. It's a USELESS #. Just tell me the # of positives. A variable so easily manipulated/erratic? Who cares? BTW.Bees, in the article you linked, they didn't mention the 130 students positive. (the single most important variable) Just the 500 or so in isolation/quarantine, and the rate.. Often how it goes. [/QUOTE]