orangenauburn
2023 Cali Award Average Attendance
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 20,925
- Like
- 36,650
so, on a scale of 1 - 10, I would say the following
Davis: 10 out of 10 that something happened between him and The Fines -- there is so much history between them that something went down, not sure it was child molestation or a sordid love triangle gone bad - but something definitely occurred between these parties
Lang: 4 out of 10 that he was molested by BF -- and that is giving him benefit of doubt. There are too many contradictions involving him that make me question his actual claims. From originally denying abuse, to being a ball boy and then letting his younger step brother be one after he was molested, to him supposedly allowing his children to be ball boys as well ... there is just something not quite clicking in regards to Lang and his allegations.
Tomaselli: too early to tell -- this guy is such a wild card and even harder to get a gauge on than the other two ... I can't put my finger on it, but he seems even less reliable than Lang, though - with the way things have played out he could be 100% honest or just a complete loon. Time will tell
either way, I personally am frustrated that so many people I know just assume it is a cover up by the University. When I ask why they think that, the response I get is - haven't you watched the news? It kills me that that is the perception
Davis: 10 out of 10 that something happened between him and The Fines -- there is so much history between them that something went down, not sure it was child molestation or a sordid love triangle gone bad - but something definitely occurred between these parties
Lang: 4 out of 10 that he was molested by BF -- and that is giving him benefit of doubt. There are too many contradictions involving him that make me question his actual claims. From originally denying abuse, to being a ball boy and then letting his younger step brother be one after he was molested, to him supposedly allowing his children to be ball boys as well ... there is just something not quite clicking in regards to Lang and his allegations.
Tomaselli: too early to tell -- this guy is such a wild card and even harder to get a gauge on than the other two ... I can't put my finger on it, but he seems even less reliable than Lang, though - with the way things have played out he could be 100% honest or just a complete loon. Time will tell
either way, I personally am frustrated that so many people I know just assume it is a cover up by the University. When I ask why they think that, the response I get is - haven't you watched the news? It kills me that that is the perception
