Orangeyes
R.I.P Dan
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 16,265
- Like
- 21,713
I am OK with an ACC/SEC Challenge as the only two P5 conferences with 8 conference games are the two involved. The other P5 conferences still must schedule within their three remaining games a P5 team, thus 10 games against P5 teams is probable, especially if a team wants a shot at the playoffs where SOS is at issue. Rebuilding teams would not be forced to play the 10th P5 game but they would be less likely to get a shot at the playoffs.
Possibly, which is why I favor 10 P5 games, but would only mandate 9 via the conference, like the SEC does (8 conference + 1 P5). The team must do what they have to do to rebuild and the conference needs to pressure the weak teams (Rutgers, VATech, NCState). Just an opinion, I am not dogmatic about it, but I really like our schedules most years. And with SS at the helm, I think we will be a conference contender often.That makes sense, but don't the SOS calculations take a teams opponents opponents into account? If so, a rebuilding ACC team that opts for an easier OOC schedule could hurt their conference mates playoff chances.
Meltdown in 3...2...1...i just like the fact that they moved the LSU game to Giants Stadium.
its about time somebody reported that fact.
the other meltdown is here it is 6/10 and the Boss didnt play MSG, Barclays, Brendan Byrne or the Rock and hasnt announced any late Summer/early Fall Giants Stadium dates.Meltdown in 3...2...1...
i just like the fact that they moved the LSU game to Giants Stadium.
its about time somebody reported that fact.
SU68 said:I'm not sure what the SEC would gain from a challenge with the ACC. They are generally recognized as the best/strongest conference and any OOC loss is considered as a terrible thing. It would be fun to watch though.
It is always good to see fan of an ACC school living in TN who has good sense.Sounds good to me. Stick it to the B1G in basketball and move to an ACC-SEC challenge for that as well.
They are being forced to by the playoff and 8 game schedule. You're right that SEC losses could benefit the ACC more than the reverse.
It is always good to see fan of an ACC school living in TN who has good sense.
I say dump the Big Ten in basketball and have a Challenge with the SEC, one that is tied to something similar in football and baseball.
SEC baseball easily has the largest TV fan base (and the largest traveling fan base). The more we play the SEC in baseball, the more games we have for the ACC network that will draw very well.
That is true, but the SEC needs something to jump start its basketball. An ACC-SEC Challenge would do that far better than anything else. Also, the SEC needs to have across rage league tough, or moderately tough, OOC schedules, and it needs to do that without inviting into the southeast a new league.
If the SEC starts playing the Big Ten often in football, more BT teams probably will recruit the southeast better, which would hurt the SEC. Because the ACC is already entrenched in the southeast, doubling or tripling the number of games against us is not going mean recruits leaving the region and its conferences.
The same logic works for baseball.