Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
An interesting theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 4048204, member: 289"] I asked the Axeman why, after three year sin which we have had 31, 25 and 24 takeovers, ("takeaways"), we have only 6 this, none in the last four games, even though we have as many sacks at Alabama and Georgia and 5 defensive backs. The first point in his response was one that Dino had already made on his show a few weeks back: we lost three NFL players and have a very young secondary, (although after ten games, how inexperienced are they?). Also, we've had some injuries back there and some guys have had to play out of position. The second point was this: The sacks have prevented us from getting takeovers because they prevent the quarterback from getting off a "desperation pass". I've always equated sacks with getting more takeovers, not less. Yes, the quarterback isn't getting the pass off but there have to be many other plays where he does get it off under duress and that produces the turnover. Certainly a lack of pressure doesn't produce more turnovers. And there's such a thing as a strip-sack, (ask Malik Willis). Naturally I had to look it up. :rolleyes: Here is the NCAA rankings of the FBS teams for "team sacks": [URL='https://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/466']NCAA College Football FBS current team Stats | NCAA.com[/URL] Here is the NCAA rankings of the FBS teams for "turnovers gained": [URL='https://www.ncaa.com/stats/football/fbs/current/team/460']NCAA College Football FBS current team Stats | NCAA.com[/URL] Here are the 12 teams with at least 34 sacks: Marshall 37 sacks 16 takeovers; Oklahoma State 37-12; Pittsburgh 36-15; Troy 39-19; Alabama 34-16; Buffalo 34-10; Georgia 34-15; Houston 34-20; Nevada-Reno 34-18; Ohio State 34-17; Mississippi 34-18; Syracuse 34-5 (Actually Cuse.com has them with 6: 3 fumble recoveries and 3 interceptions for 5. I checked the ESPN box scores and they have the same. That would mean that instead of being tied for 129th and last in a 130 team division we tied for 127th.) Here are the 13 teams with at least 20 takeovers: Cincinnati 24-25; Middle Tennessee State 22-25; Hawaii 21-24; Iowa 20-23; South Alabama 24-22; South Carolina 21-22; Washington State 17-22; Western Kentucky 25-22; Wake Forest 29-21; Boise State 23-20; Fresno State 26-20; Houston 34-20; Kent State 10-20. There are some outliers there but nothing like us. I don't see a trend that sacks somehow prevent turnovers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
An interesting theory
Top
Bottom