Issues you cite are reasons some of us don't like what's going on with college athletics.No one can say that we do not know what we need to do in order to compete. Hop would have the energy to be a private jet fly boy. Given the ridiculous player turnover in contemporary college BB, recruiting and marketing are far and away the most important responsibility of every coach. Is Kentucky the only school that comprehends reality and takes appropriate action?
We sit around smugly convinced that Cal is paying his recruits when: 1) he is outworking other coaches, and 2) he has administrative support to finance the requisite travel expenses.
well, the program more than pays for these costs with its revenues. not like they are charging tax payers
The jet money comes out of the football and basketball programs' recruiting budgets, although Calipari's has to "maintain some flexibility," given how wide a net he can cast in a given year. And he gets what he needs.I'm sure the private jet, palatial athletic facilities, etc. are paid for with private money supplied by boosters, not KY taxpayer money.
I agree. I don't like whats happening. Its now a money game. If you can't afford private jets you are at a disadvantage. The changes in college basketball suk. The trend is towards having success based on financial strength. If that happens, college BB will be worse than the NBA.Issues you cite are reasons some of us don't like what's going on with college athletics.
And they point to the ever-increasing likelihood that players will have to be paid.
The "game" is becoming more and more a "business" in every sense of the word.
Keeping up with Calipari is the trend.
Do whatever you have to do to win.
"College" is just the stage on which you're doing it.
To some extent, perhaps it's always been that way.
But the balance is shifting...radically.
Sad and disturbing in my opinion.
But that's where things are heading.
While I have no love for Kentucky or Calipari, I really doubt that any state funds are used. Given the seating capacity of Rupp Arena, and the giving levels required just to be eligible for season tickets (not to mention the SEC's television contract money), I suspect that Kentucky's basketball budget is funded entirely from student fees, private donations, and ticket sales. I know that that is the case at Virginia. The legislature would go ballistic if they thought tax revenues were being used. (In fact, UVa and William & Mary receive very little in the way of state funds for academic expenses these days, the result of a compromise that keeps dumb-ass state legislators from meddling with curricula.) Furthermore, the article didn't clarify, to my satisfaction, if the sums mentioned were the value of those flights or an actual amount paid by KY AD's office. I imagine that Kentucky, like Virginia, has more than a few alumni with the wherewithal to donate the use of private jets when they are required. The value of those flights get recorded on a balance sheet somewhere (and are probably inflated for the IRS), but the school didn't actually spend any money. And, that's been going on for a long time at lots of schools. It's nothing new.The jet money comes out of the football and basketball programs' recruiting budgets, although Calipari's has to "maintain some flexibility," given how wide a net he can cast in a given year. And he gets what he needs.
That kind of tells me that most comes out of state funds...
Student feesthey still collect about $750,000 in student fees so maybe the state taxpayers do chip in for the recruiting budget.
in another article it sites that KY'S big blue midnight madness costs the university about the same amount of money as the whole years football recruiting budget...$300,000 big ones
UK student fees that goes to athletics is $38, it gives students access to $5 basketball and football tickets. Students get use of the Seaton Center which has basketball courts, a volleyball court, badminton, jogging, squash, table tennis, and racquetball. The Johnson Center which has the same things as the Seaton Center but also has a gym/weight room, an aerobics studio, and rock climbing wall. Students also get access to the Lancaster Aquatic Center which is obviously a pool with 10 lanes for lap swimming and a pool for recreation.they still collect about $750,000 in student fees so maybe the state taxpayers do chip in for the recruiting budget.
in another article it sites that KY'S big blue midnight madness costs the university about the same amount of money as the whole years football recruiting budget...$300,000 big ones
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/05/07/ncaa-finances-subsidies/2142443/Student fees
UK student fees that goes to athletics is $38, it gives students access to $5 basketball and football tickets. Students get use of the Seaton Center which has basketball courts, a volleyball court, badminton, jogging, squash, table tennis, and racquetball. The Johnson Center which has the same things as the Seaton Center but also has a gym/weight room, an aerobics studio, and rock climbing wall. Students also get access to the Lancaster Aquatic Center which is obviously a pool with 10 lanes for lap swimming and a pool for recreation.
UK Athletics now donates $3 million yearly back to the academics side, up from the old yearly $1.7 million donation a from a few years ago, and pays $15+ million a year in tuition which a lot of athletics departments don't. Implying they collect student fees and use them for recruiting is more than misleading.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/05/07/ncaa-finances-subsidies/2142443/
even though they were in the black they still took a subsidy of $800,000 plus
Subsidy? I'm sure the athletics department would trade that $38 per student $800K total for someone else to be in charge of upkeep and management of student athletic facilities, the $3 million dollar donation, and ability to charge market value on thousands of tix. The number of athletic programs that pay for its student athletes tuition and still donate millions back to the school is tiny, implying the fee is a subsidy or has anything to do with a recruiting budget is utterly ridiculous.http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/2013/05/07/ncaa-finances-subsidies/2142443/
even though they were in the black they still took a subsidy of $800,000 plus
Subsidy? I'm sure the athletics department would trade that $38 per student $800K total for someone else to be in charge of upkeep and management of student athletic facilities, the $3 million dollar donation, and ability to charge market value on thousands of tix. The number of athletic programs that pay for its student athletes tuition and still donate millions back to the school is tiny, implying the fee is a subsidy or has anything to do with a recruiting budget is utterly ridiculous.
And if you really want to get technical, Kentucky is a state university and any funds they collect technically belongs to the state and taxpayers in which the state uses to help fund the university.
NONE...But a state representative wants a better accounting system put in place. Probably a Louisville rep.Even if it was at the taxpayers expense, I wonder how much The taxpayers would really object. It is Kentucky basketball.
If you're assuming he is a UL fan a better accounting system would be the last thing he wants.NONE...But a state representative wants a better accounting system put in place. Probably a Louisville rep.