Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Flacusian, post: 1714234, member: 264"]
It's always amusing to see people with such tortured and convoluted logic trying to defend a point which they made that is pretty much dismissed by everyone rational.  Syracuse had more wins against top teams than ANY OF THE OTHER TEAMS which have been held out as being more deserving than they were.  It's really that simple. They beat Duke at Cameron, they beat Texas A&M on a neutral court, they beat Uconn on a neutral court, and on and on...

So now this cretin wants to change the thrust of the discussion to the fact that just because Syracuse is winning it doesn't change the fact that they didn't deserve to be in the tournament.

Conversely...but correctly... just because Syracuse continues to win it doesn't make your basic premise right either. BOTTOM LINE THEY DESERVED TO BE IN... The committee thought so... and that's what makes some one deserving... its whether the committee thinks so or not. NOTHING ELSE MATTERS.

Including his head up his arse opinion. What a tool. LOL anda half.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?