Ennis is better than any 2 year SEC pg starter.
Again, I have no idea, that's why I'm asking.
We need depth behind Ennis. Nobody that transfers here is going to start over Ennis. Previous years we had an embarrassment of riches at pg.Ok, I will take your word. I just thought that with some of our other highly touted recruits not doing a lot in the their freshman year that a senior might have a shot at beating him out, like happened with MCW. I know JB hasn't been a huge fan of transfers, but he hasn't exactly been hellbent on handing the keys over to freshmen over the years either. So I was curious if it's that Golden isnt Scoop/BT caliber, or that MCW wasn't quite Ennis caliber?
Don't y'all know by now that "how Boeheim do" is to let playing time be determined by contribution, which means that getting the staring job doesn't mean much. There were good tactical reasons why Fab started, Rak started and DC started, but they pretty much trashed the value of winning the "starter" title at SU. In the end, as ye contribute, so shall ye play. All Barton and Ennis need to know is that they can compete fairly for playing time and be judged according to their contributions; as long as Barton doesn't care about that "starting" title, he should still want to come here. If Golden cares, he'll rule himself out.-VBOFAdditionally, he got Melo's stamp of approval: (I'm guessing this has been on here before, but for those who haven't seen it)
"I like the guy that’s going to Syracuse, Ennis," Anthony told SNY.tv. "He’s good. A lot of the young kids, they wouldn’t be here if they didn’t do what they was doing."
Told that Ennis projects to be the starting point guard next year for the Orange, Anthony said:
"I hope so. We’re gonna see what [Syracuse coach Jim] Boeheim does. You know how Boeheim do sometimes."
