Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 1592595, member: 204"] I think that from a technical standpoint, he is a very good writer. He turns phrases and uses analogies or metaphors quite well. I'm not sure it's true sports journalism. But, I have to say this - his two columns on Scott Shafer after the NC State game were I think the essence of sports journalism. I think those columns - agree with them or not - had true impact and touched the reader responsive chord. They were powerful. And, that is not what we typically see with him. His football since the early 2000s have typically addressed the same old tired issues - the team's mediocre won-loss record over a given time period - the number of empty seats in the Dome and the salary of the head coach. [/QUOTE]