Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JoeySimz, post: 1958173"] This. I guess I'm pretty stubborn too. I'm firmly in the 989 camp. I understand the desire to be fair to Hop, but I have major issues with 985: 1. As others have pointed out, the strength of our stance against the NCAA should be logical and consistent. If we disagree with the fundamental decision, we certainly disagree with the suspension. 2. Part of the NCAA decision reads "[I]Results of those contests from which the head men's basketball coach is suspended shall not count in the head men's basketball coach's career coaching record." [/I]I'm guessing Mike Waters is using this. Again, it is part of the decision that we are in disagreement with. 3. Furthermore, in a normal situation when a coach is absent, schools decide. The standard is that the head coach gets credit whether it's a win or loss. (I think Coach K was was the anomly and was criticized when Duke did the opposite 1995) [/QUOTE]