Are we better off now than we were then? | Syracusefan.com

Are we better off now than we were then?

SWC75

Bored Historian
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
33,545
Like
64,570
I called Alex Plavin’s post game show to suggest that this year’s team is not last year’s team and thus should not be charged with completing the “unfinished business” of last year’s team. I compared this year’s team more to the team two years ago that got off to an 18-0 start with a #3 ranking and wound up 27-8 and losing in the second round of the NCAAs. Fab Melo and Dion Waiters were ineffective that year but blossomed as stars the next year. He felt that this year’s team was “much better” than that team. Is it? Here are the per 40 minute and “net point” numbers form those teams, with my comments:

CENTERS

2010-11

Rick Jackson

35.6m 14.7p 11.6r 2.5a 1.5s 2.8b 33.1+ 4.3mfg 2.1mft 2.3to 2.3pf 11.0- = 22.1NP 8.3OE 13.8FG



Fab Melo

9.9m 9.4p 7.8r 1.0a 1.2s 3.1b 22.5+ 2.7mfg 2.0mft 3.1to 7.3pf 15.1- = 7.4NP 4.7OE 2.7FG



Baye Moussa Keita

14.6m 6.0p 10.3r 0.5a 1.6s 3.4b 21.8+ 1.9mfg 1.3mft 1.6to 5.9pf 10.7- = 11.1NP 2.8OE 8.3FG



2012-13

Rakeem Christmas

22.1m 11.9p 10.0r 0.5a 1.0s 3.6b = 27.0+ 3.9mfg 2.6mft 1.4to 3.9pf = 11.8- = 15.2NP 5.4OE 9.8FG



Baye Moussa Keita

14.4m 10.1p 10.8r 0.4a 1.8s 3.2b = 26.3+ 1.9mfg 1.9mft 1.7to 6.5pf = 26.3- = 14.3NP 6.3OE 7.9FG



DaJuan Coleman

14.0m 14.3p 12.5r 0.4a 1.6s 1.3b = 30.1+ 6.9mfg 4.6mft 3.2to 3.7pf = 18.4- = 11.7NP 2.8OE 8.9FG



Comments: All three of our centers are better than Fab and Baye were as freshman but this team could sure use a Rick Jackson down low.

FORWARDS

2010-11

Kris Joseph

32.4m 17.6p 6.5r 2.7a 1.9s 0.8b 29.5+ 6.8mfg 1.9mft 2.7to 2.3pf 13.7- = 15.8NP 8.9OE 6.9FG



CJ Fair

18.6m 13.7p 8.2r 0.9a 1.7s 1.7b 26.2+ 4.6mfg 1.7mft 1.8to 2.6pf 10.7- = 15.5NP 7.4OE 8.1FG



James Southerland

14.1m 13.7p 6.4r 1.3a 1.4s 1.6b 24.4+ 7.0mfg 0.3mft 0.6to 3.5pf 11.4- = 13.0NP 6.4OE 6.6FG



2012-13

CJ Fair

32.5m 16.5p 8.8r 0.7a 1.2s 1.3b = 28.5+ 6.7mfg 0.9mft 1.7to 2.0pf = 11.3- = 17.2NP 8.9OE 8.3FG



James Southerland

26.3m 20.8p 7.9r 1.9a 2.0s 1.5b = 34.1+ 8.2mfg 0.6mft 1.6to 3.0pf = 13.4- = 20.7NP 12.0OE 8.7FG



Jerami Grant

14.9m 13.6p 7.7r 1.2a 1.2s 1.3b = 25.0+ 4.8mfg 2.7mft 1.7to 3.6pf = 12.8- = 12.2NP 6.1OE 6.1FG



Comments: Fair and Southerland are better than Joseph and Fair were then but Southerland is no longer available to us. Grant’s numbers are actually similar to Southerland’s two years ago even if their skill package is different. Grant’s numbers may be a lot better by the end of the year with more playing time.



GUARDS

2010-11

Scoop Jardine

32.1m 15.6p 2.7r 7.3a 2.0s 0.2b 27.8+ 7.7mfg 1.3mft 3.6to 2.2pf 14.8- = 13.0NP 6.6OE 6.4FG



Brandon Triche

28.8m 15.5p 3.7r 4.0a 1.1s 0.1b 24.4+ 7.1mfg 0.6mft 2.9to 2.7pf 13.3- = 11.1NP 7.8OE 3.3FG



Dion Waiters

16.3m 16.1p 3.8r 3.6a 2.7s 0.3b 26.5+ 8.1mfg 0.6mft 2.2to 3.3pf 14.2- = 12.3NP 7.4OE 4.9FG



Mookie Jones

8.1m 17.5p 5.3r 3.0a 3.4s 0.8b 30.0+ 8.0mfg 0.0mft 1.1to 4.6pf = 13.7- = 16.3NP 9.5OE 6.8FG



2012-13

Brandon Triche

32.3m 18.5p 4.3r 4.3a 1.8s 0.2b = 29.1+ 7.9mfg 1.4mft 3.0to 2.3pf = 14.6- = 14.5NP 9.2OE 5.3FG



Michael Carter-Williams

34.2m 14.7p 5.7r 10.4a 3.5s 0.8b = 35.1+ 8.1mfg 1.7mft 4.5to 2.7pf = 16.9- = 18.2NP 4.9OE 13.3FG



Trevor Cooney

13.3m 14.1p 2.6r 2.3a 3.5s 0.3b = 22.8+ 9.5mfg 0.3mft 1.4to 2.7pf = 13.9- = 8.9NP 4.3OE 4.6FG



Comments: Triche is a better Triche. You might think of Cooney as being this year’s Jones but Mookie was actually much better. The interesting comparison is Scoop, who we always criticized for all his errors vs. MCW, who can be a spectacular talent. Scoop scored better. He had a lot of assists but not nearly Michael’s number. Michael is a much better rebounder and gets more steals. Both missed a lot of shots for a point guard. Michael makes more turnovers. We remember Scoop’s coming at all the wrong times but Michael makes a lot of ill-timed gaffes, too, mostly from trying to do too much. With Scoop, you sometimes wondered what the plan was. Dion Waiters wasn’t the player he became but we don’t have anyone like him now.



I think the 2010-11 team was better inside and is now better at the forward positions since we don’t have Southerland. I might take this year’s backcourt but with the lack of depth it’s close. I think the teams, overall, are comparable, although the strength and weaknesses are different. We’ll see how this looks at the end of the season.
 
Southerland is definitely key to the future success of this team. It's one more weapon in the arsenal.
 
We are much better that 2011. Rick carried us all year. We were never very good that year.
 
Your determination of the better team is by using your net points though.

Sent using my Commodore 64 on Tapatalk 5.3
 
Your determination of the better team is by using your net points though.

Sent using my Commodore 64 on Tapatalk 5.3

I only offered the numbers to put the discussion on an objective foundation. That's all numbers can really do. I didn't offer some kind of overall team rating based on them. If you don't accept the concept of adding the positives and subtracting the negatives the per 40 minute rates might still be useful.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
169,503
Messages
4,834,790
Members
5,979
Latest member
CB277777

Online statistics

Members online
43
Guests online
510
Total visitors
553


...
Top Bottom