Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="CU44SE, post: 5077003, member: 2196"] IMO using 50% of 2 pt FG’s is not an accurate representation, and should not be used in calculating and quantifying a good 3 point shooter. Looking at the top 90 schools (top 1/4) in the country (out of 362), the average 2 pt fg percentage is toughly 54%. That’s the equivalent of 108 points on 100 shots. That would equate to 36% from 3 point range on 100 shots. I think that is the standard, or what I would use as the standard to define a good shooter. Using 50% 2 point shooting would bring you to the 196 out of 362 teams in 2 pt fg percentage which would be worse than the top 50% of college teams. [/QUOTE]