Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="omniorange, post: 1792997, member: 636"]
I actually prefer no divisions, but since the B1G and SEC have already nixed that but both do wish to eventually get to at least 16, I think more than 2 divisions is something they might agree to, as long as it is understood that every team must play at least 8 games in conference (which takes ND out of the equation for the ACC championship game).  And whether with no divisions or a set-up of three divisions with 5 teams, either a 4-5-5 schedule or a 3-5-5 schedule can work.   I prefer the former myself but there is opposition to that which I also understand and sympathize with from FSU and Clemson.

As for content, when I speak of content mentioned earlier in the thread, I am referring to ratings based content of which only two sports truly matter - football and men's basketball, not in terms of content for a conference network.  I agree that a conference would never add WVU based only the latter.  The ACC 's current problem is not conference network type mass content that won't grab ratings on national networks, of which the ACC already has in spades.  What the ACC lacks is football strength and potential ratings in that sport.  And of the "realistic" choices, WVU far exceeds any other candidate.  Not to mention that they bring a solid men's bb program as well.

Cheers,
Neil
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?