Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Alsacs, post: 1037593, member: 652"]
The ACC can't sue for the loss of the Baltimore media market or any potential loss of earnings from not having those markets for the ACC network. Thus, the economic expert's analysis would be flawed and the court wouldn't care to be honest if they were trying to be fair. This liquidated damages provision isn't excessive or punitive if the courts looked at the damage that would be inflicted on Maryland if it was enforced. If the B1G's figures are accurate Maryland would be doubling their annual TV money going from the ACC to the B1G what is punitive or excessive in making them pay 52 million dollars or 3x the ACC payout?

The law is on the ACC's side why else would Maryland file that dumb counter-suit to try and force a settlement by scaring the ACC or their ridiculous suit in Maryland when the ACC bylaws state all court proceeding should be filed in North Carolina. Maryland's lawyers trying to forum shop isn't smart when it pisses judges off when their are no merits for such filings and even the Maryland court threw out a portion  of the lawsuit and stated the rest would be continued till the proceeding finished up in NC.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?