Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
As indicated in Friday's Thread: ACC-Maryland moving toward Settlement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="JOC44, post: 1038092, member: 613"] I don't think the doctrine of liquidated damages is the right lens through which to view this. For the non-lawyers on the board, when someone breaches a contract, the plaintiff ordinarily has to prove how much it was damaged by your breach. To use an easy example, if we have a contract for me to sell you my house for $100,000 and you don't come through, and then I try to sell it to someone else and the best I can get is $80,000, my damages are $20,000 (plus any additional costs from trying to make a second sale, etc.). Liquidated damages is a concept whereby you don't have to prove your actual losses when someone breaches your contreact. Instead, the contract has a clause that says, basically, "if you breach your obligations, you will pay me ___ in damages." These types of clauses are usually enforced only if it would be difficult to prove the amount of actual damages. So, ordinarily, you couldn't get liquidated damages in the home-sale example I used above, because actual damages are reasonably calculable. The law disfavoring liquidated damages clauses makes sense because liquidated damages provisions are usually drafted by the contracting party with more bargaining power, so the law protects the weaker party. Here, while acknowledging that I haven't seen the exit fee clause in the ACC bylaws, I don't see this as a liquidated damages issue. I don't believe Maryland breached the ACC bylaws by withdrawing. It did what it was contractually entitled to do, but that contractual entitlement comes with a set cost. That's not liquidated damages for a breach, but an agreement that schools can withdraw but have to pay a set amount to do so. Looking at it that way, where there's not a breach but a set cost for defined conduct, I think the only defense is unconscionability, which is NOT a favored defense in the law and one that is almost never available to a sophisticated party. That's how I'd pitch this if I were the ACC and I think I'd be right about this. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Men's Basketball Board
As indicated in Friday's Thread: ACC-Maryland moving toward Settlement
Top
Bottom