Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
As reported today in Orangeyes Articles: Gross says unequal revenue not a bad idea
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="arbitragegls, post: 662656, member: 302"] In the following article today, Dr. Gross indicated his belief that unequal revenue split based on teams going to bowls/NCAA March Madness etc should receive an extra kick insofar as revenue is concerned. It is interesting to go back in time and NOTE what our source had indicated and how much of it From December 6th, 2012 seems to be on target: [url]http://www.syracuse.com/orangefootball/index.ssf/2013/06/with_projected_revenue_increas.html#incart_river[/url] [SIZE=16px][FONT=Georgia][COLOR=#363636]"ACC Commissioner John Swofford said last month at the conference spring meetings that he formed a subcommittee to determine a fair structure for football bowl revenue distribution. The current system is an equal share, regardless if a school even qualified for a bowl. But many ACC school officials, including Gross, favor a model that rewards schools for competing in the postseason.[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=16px][FONT=Georgia][COLOR=#363636]Swofford hopes the subcommittee will make progress on how it will decide future bowl revenue distribution by late fall.[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=16px][FONT=Georgia][COLOR=#363636]"We're in the competition business. That's what we all signed up for," Gross said. "If a team is in last place all the time, they're still getting a bulk of the money, but they don't certainly get the part where the team has to go compete, have to go travel, the extra expenses and all those types of things. The winning team shouldn't be penalized. There should be an incentive to want to win and be there."[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] [SIZE=16px][FONT=Georgia][COLOR=#363636]Gross added: "There's an algorithm in there that can make everybody happy, where the lion's share goes to the conferences and the schools, that there's a portion left out for those that compete and advance and go further. You want to take out the million dollar free throws because none of us believe in that, but at the same time you want to reward those schools that do well."[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] As some of you probably remember (haha) back on December 6, 2012 the following was posted: [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Trebuchet MS][FONT=Georgia]So we now have the Presidents of all 15 institutions, including 'Cuse, FSU, Pitt, Clemson, GTech and Notre Dame, signing a love fest note saying all is okay...well its a start. A thread was started and I will tell you it is worth MORE THAN the paper it is written on...so here goes: (source--hopefully I got this right):[/FONT][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]ACC and ESPN are in discussions that if come to fruition...i[B]t will be happy days are here again[/B]--damn we lost another election--look for the following as might have beens that actually can happen:[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]1. ESPN [B]not to let[/B] ACC media contract stay where it is ...reasons are plentiful including but not limited to:[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--[B]Notre Dame home games[/B] with ACC teams[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--The t[B]hird most viewed conference by TV sets and gaining on #2[/B] (Big 12 way behind)[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]2. ACC working on possibility of [B]changing revenue distribution but not for the overall TV contract [/B](split overall TV contract equally)[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--[B]example[/B]:[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]a) FSU in Orange Bowl pays $17,000,000+ pay out[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]b) take out travel/incidentals etc prior to splitting equally with conference (way done now)[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--did conference play the game or did FSU?[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]c) perhaps give FSU an additional $4 million or whatever out of game[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]d) [B]split the remainder equally among[/B] non participants of that game[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]e) [B]Repeat for each and every football ball Bowl game each team plays[/B] in[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1] [/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia][B]Now a really cool move[/B]:[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]) [B]do the same for each bball team that gets to the NCAA's/NIT[/B][/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--for each round team gets travel money plus a larger share of the dollars earned for each round before being equally distributed to other teams...[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]--now teams like Wake Forest if not making extra dollars on football field, can make extra dollars being a heck of a good bball team[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]G) Result is all teams share Overall TV contract...all teams receive equal distribution of football bowl games and NCAA and NIT bball games...except teams playing in BOWL or BBall Tournament receive a $$ sum off the top before distribution[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia][B]Expectations are that 1 will happen soon and that 2 is under advisement and being discussed/well received[/B]...[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]3. Maryland [B]fee to leave conference[/B] is important...but if #1 and potentially #2 happen, it really will not make a key difference for teams leaving...why leave if you play in a [B]BOWL[/B] and/or [B]bball tournament [/B]each team can bring in significant added dollars...this could be even more a significant $$$$ hit for 'Cuse...[/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [INDENT=1] [/INDENT] [INDENT=1][COLOR=#000000][SIZE=13px][FONT=Georgia]Discuss/questions/fingers crossed![/FONT][/SIZE][/COLOR][/INDENT] [LEFT][SIZE=11px][FONT=Trebuchet MS][COLOR=#969696][URL='http://syracusefan.com/members/arbitragegls.302/'][COLOR=#969696]arbitragegls[/COLOR][/URL], [URL='http://syracusefan.com/threads/whats-it-all-about-acc.38479/'][COLOR=#969696]Dec 6, 2012[/COLOR][/URL][/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE][/LEFT] [LEFT] [/LEFT] [LEFT]The point of this is that we are in a stable, forward looking Conference. The ACC is committed to continue its movement forward: academically, athletically, and revenue wise...[B]sure it may take time for "good things" to happen...but those "good things" have been set in motion[/B]! In the coming weeks we will have more to discuss based on above revenue share and also the ACC Network moving forward![/LEFT] [LEFT] [/LEFT] [LEFT][B]It's Is Good to be 'Cuse!!!!![/B][/LEFT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
As reported today in Orangeyes Articles: Gross says unequal revenue not a bad idea
Top
Bottom