Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="ivorytower, post: 3519498, member: 6888"]
Hmmmm, You aint running three lines since 1st will see much time. . My guess is 7 mids used.

With all due respect to Tenaglia, not sure Id place him in front of several others .  . Know he had some success at Furman at attack and coaches liked his tape  but can he even play mid. As Jeremy pointed out, some attackman can, some really cant  and that switch takes time and practice which may be in shorter supply this year.

Remember that many believe Hiltz is as good as Oneill who is labeled a generational talent ?  Hiltz may be a better overall prospect than  Spallina who will be very good. My guess is good p/twill be carved out for him at either attack or at mid or perhaps at both.

Next likely in line  behind Buttermore (and maybe Hiltz) imo  would be Seebold who was standing out in practice, looked to be on verge of breaking out and has shown he can play mid . His size and array could make him  another inverting weapon.  Seebold erminds me of Garret Leadmon of Duke

Then there is Quinn who has been part of Cuse plans for three years since his arrival. Injuries and inconsistency has held him back but the talent n shot is there so expect him to get every opportunity in his fourth year .

and Ill throw this out, Aviles would be very good mid though think they'll leave him at ssdm

Lost the experience of Lipka and the size of Kims who could play but numerous good candidates to fill. Nice problem to have .
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?