Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="nzm136, post: 2625718, member: 2531"] The top 2 aren’t relevant: A) the more chances to score is balanced out by The other team having more chances to score. Unless you mean Dino’s system has more chances to score because it takes more long shots at the end zone. But that’s only relevant if it’s more efficient than other systems at scoring, which it isn’t (as of yet). B) The other team only feels pressure if we’re winning. Otherwise, our defense is the unit feeling the pressure. The bottom 2 are true, but they’re misleading. He takes more risks which leads to upsets, both good and bad (MTSU vs Clemson). If you focus on the Clemson’s and VPIs, you only tell half of the story. You miss the costs. I think that Dino has done a good job handling talent (recruiting it and keeping it when needed), and he has been smart enough to exploit most weaknesses when they appeared. IMO, Dino is the difference, not his system. [/QUOTE]