no, he was fouled with 1 sec left on shot clock, should have been 2 ft's in the actNo. He was fouled after the shot clock violation. Everything stops when the violation happens. BT was fouled basically during a time out.
No. He was fouled after the shot clock violation. Everything stops when the violation happens. BT was fouled basically during a time out.
You're wrong...the replay showed that the shot clock expired between BT getting fouled and getting the shot-off.No. He was fouled after the shot clock violation. Everything stops when the violation happens. BT was fouled basically during a time out.
Who cares. We're playing like absolute garbage. It's a 16 vs. 1, we shouldn't need calls to go our way.
No he wasn't. And 3 refs saw that same thing as did the crew doing the game. The game clock was at 1. Not the shot clock. I wish it counted but it didn't.
Wrong. He was fouled then continued up for the shot, clock expired between the two not before. Regardless this is terrible.No he wasn't. And 3 refs saw that same thing as did the crew doing the game. The game clock was at 1. Not the shot clock. I wish it counted but it didn't. And for the record, he couldn't have 2 foul shots. Either he was fouled before the violation, and the shot would have counted and it would be an and 1 or it was after the shot clock violation. Which it was.