Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3083454, member: 289"]
After the Indians series (8/20-22/19)

METS
Single-		157
Double-		90
Triple-		10
Home Run-	277
Walk- 		11
Balk- 		1
Out- 		26
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		20
Sac Bunt-
Wild Pitch-	3
Passed Ball-
Hit by Pitch- 	3
The Mets have scored 617 runs so 45% are from home runs

OTHER GUYS
Single-		153
Double-		105
Triple-		8
Home Run-	232
Walk- 		7
Balk- 		 
Out- 		28
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		31
Sac Bunt-	1
Wild Pitch-	5
Passed Ball-	2
Hit by Pitch-	3
The other guys have scored 589 runs so 39% of their runs come from home runs.

In this series just 5 of the Mets 15 runs came via the home run, 33%. (over the last three series it’s 13 of 48 = 27%). The Indians got 2 of their 5 from homers, (40%). The two teams hit 10 doubles, (by 10 different players) and 3 of the players who hit them scored.  I’ve been keeping track of this since August 1st and 29 of 69 players who have hit doubles scored, (42%). The Mets have hit 183 home runs, so homers have driven in 94 teammates while doubles have driven in 90. The opposition has hit 159 homers so homers have driven in 73 teammates compared to 105 for doubles. The Mets have 220 doubles. If 42% of those players scored, that’s 92 runs. The opponents have hit 229 doubles. 42% of that is 96 runs. That would mean that homers have accounted for 277 Mets runs and doubles have accounted for 182, meaning Mets doubles have bene 66% as effective as home runs. The opposition have produced 232 runs via the homer, 105 + 96 = 201 via doubles. That’s 87%. Combine those numbers and you get 383/509 = doubles are 75% of home runs.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?