Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3092909, member: 289"]
After the Phillies series (8/30-9/1/19)

METS
Single-		165
Double-		94
Triple-		10
Home Run-	296
Walk- 		12
Balk- 		1
Out- 		30
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		20
Sac Bunt-
Wild Pitch-	3
Passed Ball-
Hit by Pitch- 	3
The Mets have scored 653 runs so 45% are from home runs

OTHER GUYS
Single-		162
Double-		115
Triple-		8
Home Run-	253
Walk- 		8
Balk- 		 
Out- 		30
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		32
Sac Bunt-	1
Wild Pitch-	5
Passed Ball-	2
Hit by Pitch-	3
The other guys have scored 634 runs so 40% of their runs come from home runs.

In this series 9 of the Mets 19 runs came via the home run, 47%. The Phillies got 2 of their 13 from homers, (just 15%). The two teams hit 16 doubles and 4 of the players who hit them scored.  I’ve been keeping track of this since August 1st and 41 of 103 players who have hit doubles scored, (40%). The Mets have hit 193 home runs, so homers have driven in 103 teammates while doubles have driven in 94. The opposition has hit 173 homers so homers have driven in 80 teammates compared to 115 for doubles. The Mets have 235 doubles. If 40% of those players scored, that’s 94 runs. The opponents have hit 249 doubles. 40% of that is 100 runs. That would mean that homers have accounted for 296 Mets runs and doubles have accounted for (94 + 94=) 188, meaning Mets doubles have been 64% as effective as home runs. The opposition has produced 253 runs via the homer, (115 + 100=) 215 via doubles. That’s 85%. Combine those numbers and you get 403/549 = doubles are 73% of home runs.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?