Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3101403, member: 289"]
After the Phillies series (9/6-8/19)

METS
Single-		174
Double-		99
Triple-		10
Home Run-	312
Walk- 		13
Balk- 		1
Out- 		31
Error-		15
Sac Fly-		22
Sac Bunt-
Wild Pitch-	3
Passed Ball-
Hit by Pitch- 	3
The Mets have scored 690 runs so 45% are from home runs

OTHER GUYS
Single-		172
Double-		124
Triple-		8
Home Run-	269
Walk- 		9
Balk- 		 
Out- 		30
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		33
Sac Bunt-	1
Wild Pitch-	5
Passed Ball-	2
Hit by Pitch-	3
The other guys have scored 671 runs so 40% of their runs come from home runs.

In this series 4 of the Mets 12 runs came via the home run, 33%. The Philliess got 8 of their 19 from homers, (42%). The two teams hit 10 doubles and 2 of the players who hit them scored.  I’ve been keeping track of this since August 1st and 50 of 128 players who have hit doubles scored, (39%). The Mets have hit 204 home runs, so homers have driven in 108 teammates while doubles have driven in 99. The opposition has hit 181 homers so homers have driven in 88 teammates compared to 124 for doubles. The Mets have 244 doubles. If 39% of those players scored, that’s 95 runs. The opponents have hit 265 doubles. 39% of that is 103 runs. That would mean that homers have accounted for 312 Mets runs and doubles have accounted for (95 + 99=) 194, meaning Mets doubles have been 62% as effective as home runs. The opposition has produced 269 runs via the homer and (103 + 124=) 227 via doubles. That’s 84%. Combine those numbers and you get 421/581 = doubles are 72% of home runs.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?