Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3117389, member: 289"]
After the Reds series (9/20-22/19)

METS
Single-		185
Double-		108
Triple-		12
Home Run-	350
Walk- 		14
Balk- 		1
Out- 		35
Error-		15
Sac Fly-		22
Sac Bunt-
Wild Pitch-	3
Passed Ball-
Hit by Pitch- 	4
The Mets have scored 756 runs so 46% are from home runs

OTHER GUYS
Single-		185
Double-		129
Triple-		8
Home Run-	286
Walk- 		9
Balk- 		 
Out- 		30
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		35
Sac Bunt-	1
Wild Pitch-	5
Passed Ball-	2
Hit by Pitch-	3
The other guys have scored 708 runs so 40% of their runs come from home runs.

In this series 10 of the Mets 16 runs came via the home run, 62.5%. The Reds got 3 of their 7 from homers, (43%). The two teams hit 7 doubles, (the Mets had 6 of them) and 2 of the players who hit them scored.  I’ve been keeping track of this since August 1st and 58 of 162 players who have hit doubles scored, (36%). The Mets have hit 232 home runs, so homers have driven in 118 teammates while doubles have driven in 108. The opposition has hit 195 homers so homers have driven in 91 teammates compared to 129 for doubles. The Mets have 268 doubles. If 36% of those players scored, that’s 96 runs. The opponents have hit 278 doubles. 36% of that is 100 runs. That would mean that homers have accounted for 350 Mets runs and doubles have accounted for (108 + 96=) 199 meaning Mets doubles have been 57% as effective as home runs. The opposition has produced 276 runs via the homer and (100 + 129) 229 via doubles. That’s 83%. Combine those numbers and you get 428/626 = doubles are 68% of home runs.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?