Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="SWC75, post: 3120536, member: 289"]
After the Marlins series (9/23-26/19)

METS
Single-		187
Double-		112
Triple-		12
Home Run-	361
Walk- 		15
Balk- 		1
Out- 		35
Error-		15
Sac Fly-		25
Sac Bunt-
Wild Pitch-	3
Passed Ball-
Hit by Pitch- 	4
The Mets have scored 777 runs so 46% are from home runs

OTHER GUYS
Single-		192
Double-		129
Triple-		8
Home Run-	298
Walk- 		9
Balk- 		 
Out- 		30
Error-		13
Sac Fly-		35
Sac Bunt-	1
Wild Pitch-	5
Passed Ball-	2
Hit by Pitch-	3
The other guys have scored 727 runs so 41% of their runs come from home runs.

In this series 11 of the Mets 21 runs came via the home run, 52%. The Reds got 12 of their 19 from homers, (63%). The two teams hit 15 doubles, (the Mets had 8 of them) and 9 of the players who hit them scored.  I’ve been keeping track of this since August 1st and 67 of 177 players who have hit doubles scored, (38%). The Mets have hit 235 home runs, so homers have driven in 126 teammates while doubles have driven in 112. The opposition has hit 200 homers so homers have driven in 98 teammates compared to 129 for doubles. The Mets have 276 doubles. If 38% of those players scored, that’s 105 runs. The opponents have hit 285 doubles. 38% of that is 108 runs. That would mean that homers have accounted for 361 Mets runs and doubles have accounted for (112 + 99=) 210 meaning Mets doubles have been 58% as effective as home runs. The opposition has produced 298 runs via the homer and (108 + 129) 237 via doubles. That’s 80%. Combine those numbers and you get 447/659 = doubles are 68% of home runs.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?