Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="dinosaurbbq, post: 1797377, member: 1333"]
If Briles talked to victims at all or knew of it being done and did nothing in response, that would be grounds for firing.  I haven't seen or heard anything yet that indicates that is the case.

Briles did not lie about Ukwuachu -- First off, Peterson did not say he told Briles Ukwuachu was a threat and not ready to resume playing.  Second, Peterson's statement on the subject is vague and unclear.  Third, even if he did, Briles denies that and it would be one coach's word against another.  Fourth, BSU submitted a form to BU stating Ukwuachu was not suspended for disciplinary reasons and was eligible to play at BSU if he returned there and did not transfer, which makes it pretty darn unlikely for Peterson to have told Briles Ukwuachu was a threat to women.  Fifth, Ukwuachu never played for BU anyway.  See link: [URL="http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/8/21/9189025/baylor-boise-state-art-briles-sam-ukwuachu"]Exactly what Chris Petersen told Art Briles about Sam Ukwuachu is critical[/URL]

Finally, where there is smoke there is fire is fatally flawed reasoning that reaches conclusions without evidence.  That is not a proper basis for taking any action, otherwise, we would not have criminal trials, we would simply convict all those charged with crimes.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?