Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Townie72, post: 40153, member: 780"] I noticed you didn't respond to Orangecuse's points above. He could no doubt use some illumination from a legal scholar such as yourself. Seems to me UConn has been down this law suit path before racking up some huge legal bills and accomplishing nothing. Except poisoning the well for themselves. USF has reportedly been blocking UCF for years. What's the difference? The ACC wanted to expand by two members to take advantage of a clause in the ESPN contract that allowed them to renegotiate if they did so. UConn was a candidate. In discussions with ACC member schools, BC objected. There may have been others who also objected. So they moved on to Pitt, UConn was left out. They aren't owed a spot in the ACC. And BC is entitled to their opinions as to who would make a good ACC member. [/QUOTE]