Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
BC Backpedal
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="Townie72, post: 40295, member: 780"] I get the "contract" part .. but not the "partner" piece. No one has violated any contracts here. Many of thse discussions seem to suggest that the ACC had no idea that: 1. Their contract had a provision that either ESPN or the ACC could renegotiate the deal if the conference added or lost two or more schools. 2. That the market price of these contracts has risen tremendously since the ACC signed its contract. Love him or hate him this guy Swofford is a pretty smart guy. I think the ACC was well aware of points 1 and 2 above. The ACC didn't need ESPN to coach them. They may have asked ESPN which the available schools might yeild the most money in a re-negotiated contract. But, there again, Swofford is no dummy and he probably had his own ideas on his. The original idea was to add SU and UConn. That may have been ESPN's advice. But Swofford ran into resistance to this within his own membership. Remember, it wasn't just BC that the UConn-driven lawsuit targeted but the ACC, as well. And no one in their right mind brings in a new "litigious" partner. Apparently, no one objected to Pitt, so they got the bid. Much of UConn's problem in this is their own history. Then Attorney General Blumenthal drove that law suit. And now its coming back to bite them in the butt. Besides, UConn is not suing anybody. The new CT governor --- a BC grad --- met with BC President Leahy on this and he came away with two messages. These were: 1. The only way UConn gets in the ACC is in a package deal with Notre Dame. If that doen't occur than the ACC might be looking to expand again in two to four years. 2. That, in the interim, UConn should not do anything else to piss off BC any more than they have. Based on that, I'd say that the CT governor and the UConn president don't want to sue anybody. In fact, I'll think you'll see a charm offensive from UConn. And if it weren't for that grandstanding, slimeball Blumenthal, they probably would have been picked over Pitt. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
BC Backpedal
Top
Bottom