Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Townie72, post: 40308, member: 780"]
From what we know of what happened, UConn was the second choice after SU. So if there were scenarios laid out for the ACC by ESPN, UConn couldn't have much of a complaint about.

Where UConn's invitation got waylaid was in the ACC's internal conversation. And we know --- because the BC AD told us --- that BC was against UConn's membership. Just like USF has been against UCF's entrance into the Big East before the current "crisis".

But this is all silliness. UConn isn't suing anybody. They aren't suing ESPN. ESPN is one of CT's most valuable assets. And someone once said that you don't pick a fight with someone that buys ink by the car load. (Talking about newspapers in yesteryear)

And they aren't suing the ACC ... they are curently grovelling for an invitation that might happen. And they aren't suing BC. They need BC to acquiesce.

All this talk of a lawsuit is a few columnists and some people venting their spleens on the internet.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?