Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="Stern, post: 81678, member: 527"]
Doing it this way will be worse for someone like you who wants that. This makes the current system "likable". These current non AQ conference will have to fend for themselves now, including a conference like the Big East. Lets be honest, the Fiesta will have a tie in with the Big 12 and have 1 at large. the Orange will have a tie-in with the ACC and have an at large. And the Sugar will tie in with the SEC and have and at large. With 3 at large/open spots. You could have 2 SEC schools and ND take an at large spot. Or whatever combination you want to come up with. If the game is meaningless and there are no rules or pecking order as to who these 3 bowls have to take or forced to take this team...then its about taking the team that will bring in the most money. Leaving out every Big East school, leaving out many smaller schools in the "major conferences" who don't travel well, and even hurting a team like Boise. I mean who ya taking a 11-0 Boise team or a 8-3 Notre Dame. Or a 9-2 Ohio St team...a school like Boise is dead with this new rule. If not forced nobody is going to take them now. Boise can go 11-0, NOT be in the Top 2 of the BCS, so it takes them out of the national title. And since none of the major bowls are forced to take them, they can go play in some garbage bowl and make zero money in a joke of a game vs the 2nd team out of the Mountain West or something.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?