Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="billsin01, post: 322302, member: 837"] You keep arguing this one point, about which you may be 110% correct. I'll admit I don't know. But I think the point most others are making is that there was an overwhelming amount of circumstantial evidence that pointed to Sandusky being up to some inappropriate stuff (even if you discount reports of showers and simply talk about the constant and exceptionally close contact with the kids) [I]at least[/I] in '98 and likely long before then. This seems fairly inarguable and absolutely condemns the university. Pointing to one psych eval and saying, "see, how were they supposed to know?" is at best a pretty thin argument and at worst intellectually dishonest. [/QUOTE]