Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 322354, member: 204"]
No.
 
It was the kid's psychologist who correctly read the situation.
 
Here is the quote from the Freeh report: "At 7:34 am, May 4, 1998 the boy's mother called Alycia Chambers, a licensed State College psychologist who had been working with her son so see if she was 'overreacting' to Sandusky showering with her son."
 
Got it?
 
The psychologist had already been working with the boy - she was not the school's psychologist - she worked in State College.  And she did the right thing - she reported the situation.
 
It was the DPW psychologist - Seasock - who concluded that there was no sexual act - that Sandusky did not become a pedophile at age 52. And it was Seasock who could not be reasoned with by the police detective, Schreffler.  
 
Indeed, the report concluded that [B]"A senior administrator of a local victim resource center [an advocate for victims!!!] familiar with the 1998 incident said the case against Sandusky was 'severely hampered' by Seasock's report."[/B]
 
Again it was Seasock's misguided conclusion that stopped the process.
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?