Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="OrangePA, post: 322364, member: 204"] Oh my goodness. You're trying so hard to argue. The report made clear that there was no relationship between Seasock and the school at the time he interviewed the kid. And the report concluded that the school had no involvement in the investigation. Yes, to make sure that there was no impropriety, Freeh looked to see if there was, at any time, any financial or employment connection between PSU and Seasock. He determined that later on Seasock did some consulting for the school but made nothing of it. My purpose in posting was not to review the entire Freeh report - word for word - regarding 1998. It was to continue my discussion with Bees' regarding his conviction that the school influenced the outcome of the DA's decision not to prosecute at that time. Freeh concluded that the school did not influence that decision. Got that genius? [/QUOTE]