Best SU 0-2 Team Ever | Syracusefan.com

Best SU 0-2 Team Ever

syr02esq

Starter
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
1,311
Like
460
Ok, a little flare for the dramatic. But honestly, we are a lot better than our record shows. In my opinion, this is the best SU team (offense and defense) since the McNabb era. If we can fix our ST issues, I think we have a better shot of beating USC.

I remember last year our defenders bouncing off of offensive players like a pinball machine. This game, maybe once or twice. Not only is our defense faster, but they are stronger. I'm also pretty happy with the DL play and the pressure on the QB. Take away some of USC's big plays, and we are in there guys.

Yes, my orange colored glasses are on.
 
agree

the talent is there

gotta put it together moving forward
 
2001 would beat this team to a pulp
Hyperbole. This year's offense is much better than the Deleone/RJ Anderson version, though that team had one of the best defenses we've probably ever had.
 
Hyperbole. This year's offense is much better than the Deleone/RJ Anderson version, though that team had one of the best defenses we've probably ever had.
so who are u accusing of hyperbole?me or the op? i think the 2001 team wins convincingly.
 
This is not a good 0-2 team I am sorry. They are improved yes, but not good.

Special teams is awful. Tackling is poor. QB gets rattled far too easy. This is a 5-6 win team that might fall short of going to a bowl game. That isn't good. Not in this day in age where damn near everyone goes to a bowl game.
 
hard to say the tackling is poor when really we only have pro's from usc to compare too. the NW kids were pretty good as well. if we struggle next week then we need to be worried.
 
This is not a good 0-2 team I am sorry. They are improved yes, but not good.

Special teams is awful. Tackling is poor. QB gets rattled far too easy. This is a 5-6 win team that might fall short of going to a bowl game. That isn't good. Not in this day in age where damn near everyone goes to a bowl game.

Which 0-2 SU team do you think is better and why? Modern era please.
 
so who are u accusing of hyperbole?me or the op? i think the 2001 team wins convincingly.
I think 2001 was better but 2012 could hang for a while. Better QB, better receivers on this year's team.
 
Because you know what 2001 became right now it was better, this team has a lot of young players who will be better as the season goes along. We need to find a kick returner for kickoffs and punts, why not hunt he isn't playing QB and he is athletic?
 
Which 0-2 SU team do you think is better and why? Modern era please.

The 1996 team would be somewhere around a 10-14 point favorite against the 2012 team.
 
This is not a good 0-2 team I am sorry. They are improved yes, but not good.

Special teams is awful. Tackling is poor. QB gets rattled far too easy. This is a 5-6 win team that might fall short of going to a bowl game. That isn't good. Not in this day in age where damn near everyone goes to a bowl game.

Good lord.
 
Which 0-2 SU team do you think is better and why? Modern era please.

Ummm, maybe the 1996 team that bitchslapped VaTech in game 3, won 8 in a row, went on to tie for the Big East title, won a bowl game, and finished 9-3?
 
Ummm, maybe the 1996 team that bitchslapped VaTech in game 3, won 8 in a row, went on to tie for the Big East title, won a bowl game, and finished 9-3?

Wasn't McNabb on this team? Go see my original post.
 
This is not a good 0-2 team I am sorry. They are improved yes, but not good.

Special teams is awful. Tackling is poor. QB gets rattled far too easy. This is a 5-6 win team that might fall short of going to a bowl game. That isn't good. Not in this day in age where damn near everyone goes to a bowl game.
You really need to find another team to follow. Please.
 
Good lord.


I know--unbelievable.

But you have to put it in the context that this poster predicted we'd win 2-3 games, and is desperately clinging to that belief.
 
I know--unbelievable.

But you have to put it in the context that this poster predicted we'd win 2-3 games, and is desperately clinging to that belief.
He will sorely be disappointed at the end of the season! ;)
 
I know--unbelievable.

But you have to put it in the context that this poster predicted we'd win 2-3 games, and is desperately clinging to that belief.
I never predicted we would win 2 or 3 games. I simply said IF we win 2 or 3 games (because we have a tough OOC schedule and Doug has been poor in BE games) then Doug should be let go. No need to spin or twist my words. I am not running away from anything I have said. But at least get it right.
 
Stern, you are a miserable, pessimistic man. I feel bad for the people that are close to you. It's pretty obvious that you have an agenda and will stick to it no matter what.
 
Stern, you are a miserable, pessimistic man. I feel bad for the people that are close to you. It's pretty obvious that you have an agenda and will stick to it no matter what.
lol, really? Because we have a different opinion on a football team. Uh ok!
 
To be bowl eligible this team needs to go 6-4 the rest of the way. Based on what I've seen so far, and the fact that Pugh is close to returning, I see that as very doable.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
172,398
Messages
5,016,656
Members
6,027
Latest member
Old Timer

Online statistics

Members online
212
Guests online
6,691
Total visitors
6,903


...
Top Bottom