Reply to thread

Message

[QUOTE="omniorange, post: 879030, member: 636"]
This I agree with, but I'd say the 3-4 losses already factors in the What "luck" element.  Realistically, we should only lose @Duke and @Pitt which is what most computer projections have us doing.

As for the rest of your post, it was a waste of time since any one who follows the sport at all knows that this year's ACC is nowhere near the level of strength of the Big East from 20008-09 through 2012-13.   But the real point of my post was that how this Syracuse team performs this year will have far, far more to do with us than playing against this year's version of the ACC.  And those that seem to feel that this team is overrated, such as yourself, will have more of those What type losses while those who think this team is actually as good, if not better than our 09-10 and 11-12 teams will see anything more than 3 losses in conference as underperforming.  At this point I think we are slightly less than those two teams but if we continue to get better play from Rak and BMK and SilentG becomes more assertive on the offensive end, this team will at least be equal to those two teams.

Personally, I believe the UNC and Pitt home games will tell the story as to how the rest of the season goes.

Cheers,
Neil
[/QUOTE]

Verification

What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?