Change Ad Consent
Do not sell my daa
Reply to thread | Syracusefan.com
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Media
Daily Orange Sports
ACC Network Channel Numbers
Syracuse.com Sports
Cuse.com
Pages
Football Pages
7th Annual Cali Award Predictions
2024 Roster / Depth Chart [Updated 8/26/24]
Syracuse University Football/TV Schedules
Syracuse University Football Commits
Syracuse University Football Recruiting Database
Syracuse Football Eligibility Chart
Basketball Pages
SU Men's Basketball Schedule
Syracuse Men's Basketball Recruiting Database
Syracuse University Basketball Commits
2024/25 Men's Basketball Roster
Chat
Football
Lacrosse
Men's Basketball
Women's Basketball
NIL
SyraCRUZ Tailgate NIL
Military Appreciation Syracruz Donation
ORANGE UNITED NIL
SyraCRUZ kickoff challenge
Special VIP Opportunity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Big Ten Discussing $2 Billion Private Capital Deal
.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
[QUOTE="FloridaCuse, post: 5531484, member: 8912"] A number of posts earlier asked the question whether the entity created by the B1G to manage the media rights and sponsorships, that the investment fund would own 10% of, would be a taxable entity. I am a retired tax expert (both in government and in private practice) but not in this area of the tax law of tax-exempt organizations and unrelated business income of such organizations. I did look at the basic principles of tax law involved in determining that and on first look there does not ap⁷pear to be a clear answer. (Not untypical of the tax law.) By way of background, the concept of taxing unrelated business income of tax-exempt organizations goes back to the 1950s when New York University owned the Mueller Macaroni Company. It was thought by Congress that it was unfair for a private business enterprise to be tax free when its competitors had to pay income tax. One sticking point in the present B1G case might be would the new B1G entity be in business competition with a taxable enterprise. I'll do more research on this when I have an opportunity. If this deal goes forward. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What is a Syracuse fan's favorite color?
Post reply
Forums
Syracuse Athletics
Syracuse Football Board
Big Ten Discussing $2 Billion Private Capital Deal
Top
Bottom