Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="JeremyCuse, post: 5005324, member: 43"] Usually the player in question is in danger of being cut and agrees to restructure to stay with his current team in exchange for a certain amount of money now guaranteed and the updated contract usually makes being cut totally untenable. Guys coming off a few injury plagued seasons are usually prime restructure candidates. What's odd in Miller and Knoxs case was that they had almost all the leverage in that Buffalo would have had to take severe dead cap hits had they been let go making cutting either highly unlikely though not impossible. Both likely saw the issue Buffalo was in cap wise and agreed to restructure to help the team and ensure they weren't a psot June 1 cap casualty even if that was unlikely. [/QUOTE]